“Court confirms the necessity of strict adherence to conditions under replacement cost endorsements”

In a recent decision, the B.C. Supreme Court has confirmed that insurers who issue replacement cost endorsements to property policies are not required to fund replacement of damaged property in advance. Rather, insureds under such policies are required to adhere …

Keep reading

Privilege over investigation materials

The recent decision in Plenert v. Melnik Estate, 2016 BCSC 403 provides an additional arrow in the quiver of insurers and insureds seeking to claim privilege over investigative documents and adjusters’ reports prepared prior to the commencement of litigation.…

Keep reading

No Do-Overs Allowed

Alternative dispute resolution is increasingly being used for settling disputes. As a practical matter, it is now virtually impossible to appeal most arbitral findings, making it clear that claims resolution through arbitration proceedings can entail much greater risk for insurers …

Keep reading

Landlord avoids voiding of homeowners policy, but is denied replacement cost value:

In Bahniwal v. The Mutual Fire Insurance Company of British Columbia, 2016 BCSC 422, the BC Supreme Court considered the application of statutory conditions 1 and 4 and a replacement cost endorsement in a homeowners insurance policy. The claim …

Keep reading

Overzealous denial of claim results in large punitive damage award

The recent BC Supreme Court decision Arsenovski v. Bodin, 2016 BCSC 359, illustrates, by way of an extreme example, the risk insurers run by overzealous denial of an insured’s claim.

The case arose from the insurer’s decision to deny …

Keep reading

Insurance Coverage for Negligent Parenting?

A new case has just come down that should be of interest where claims are made by infants or others under a disability and there is a third party claim against a family member for their alleged negligence relating to …

Keep reading

Gardening 101: Construing Efficacy Exclusions in Commercial General Liability Insurance Policies

In West Creek Farms Ltd. v. Lloyd’s Underwriters, 2016 BCSC 48, Mr. Justice Macintosh considered general and specific principles of contractual interpretation to parse an efficacy exclusion clause in which ambiguity was unearthed.

Mardell Greenhouses Inc. (“Mardell”) purchased …

Keep reading

Exclusion Clauses and Fortuitous Damage

The recent B.C. case of Wynward Insurance Group v. MS Developments Inc., 2015 BCSC 324 (“Wynward Insurance”), looks at an insurance policy exclusion clause for damage “caused directly or indirectly” by earth expansion and offers clarification as …

Keep reading

Self-Represented Litigant Ordered to Pay Double Costs to Insurer

Most Insurers are aware of the higher costs associated with litigation where the opposing party is self-represented. High costs can be due to a variety of factors, such as numerous applications, failure to follow procedural steps, irrelevant claims and lengthy …

Keep reading

Recent Court of Appeal Decision Holds Cyclist Entirely at Fault for Passing Vehicle on the Right

The British Columbia Court of Appeal recently found a cyclist to be solely at fault for an accident occurring when the cyclist attempted to pass a motor vehicle on the right. Following the Court of Appeal decision, leave to appeal …

Keep reading